Proposal — Density Screen, Reference Colocation Campus hall DH-02

Reference Project (synthetic) · prepared 2026-09-14 · valid to 2026-10-14 · target platform NVIDIA GB300 NVL72

Client
Reference Project (synthetic)
Site
Reference Colocation Campus
Hall
DH-02
Engagement
Density Screen
Fee
EUR 4,500
Turnaround
5 working days
The findings below are a screening read produced before this engagement begins. They are modelled from the inputs supplied, not measured at the site.

1. What we already found

We ran your hall through the capacity engine before writing this. The following is not a claim about what we might do; it is what the constraint set already says, on the inputs you supplied.

Deployable NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 racks as the hall stands
0 racks (E0)
Limited by: platform needs 205 [174–236] A (E0) per rack; installed tap-offs rated 63 A (E5)
Deployable after the costed ladder
62 racks (E0)
Limited by: Full DLC plus behind-the-meter supply
Time to full capacity
160 [112–256] weeks (E3)
Limited by: set by transformer capacity
Binding constraint: Rack feed / tap-off rating (electrical). platform needs 205 [174–236] A (E0) per rack; installed tap-offs rated 63 A (E5).
On these inputs the hall cannot host a single rack of the target platform today. That is a finding, not a sales problem — and a credible 'not without these three things' is worth the fee on its own.

2. What this engagement answers

What stops this hall first, and how far can it go?

You receive: Density Screen document (HTML and Markdown), the first six rungs of the headroom ladder, and a data request you can hand your own engineers verbatim.

3. What we need from you

Intake is 83% complete. Each row below is a number that moves the answer and that nobody has measured. Anything you cannot supply is filled from a library default and named as an assumption in the deliverable — nothing is invented silently.

InputStatusAssumed if not suppliedWhere it comes from
Installed CDU scheduleoptional[]CDU nameplates and the mechanical single-line diagram.
TCS target supply temperatureoptional30 [27–32] degC (E0)The platform vendor's reference design for the target rack.
Rear-door heat exchanger capacity per rackoptional60 [20–80] kW (E0)The selected rear-door unit's datasheet at the site's water temperature and airflow.
All-in grid electricity priceoptionallibrary placeholder of 140 EUR/MWh (E0)The supply contract, or 12 months of invoices divided by metered energy.
Discount rateoptionalnone: the lifecycle value is undiscountedThe client's hurdle rate.

4. Fee, timing and terms

ItemTerms
FeeEUR 4,500, fixed
Turnaround5 working days from a complete intake
Payment100% on commissioning. The engagement opens when payment clears.
CreditCredits in full against the envelope study.
ValidityThis proposal is valid to 2026-10-14.
IndependenceWe quote no equipment and take no margin on hardware. Nothing in the deliverable routes you to a supplier we are paid by.

Fixed fee. We do not bill hours, because you are buying an answer.

Fee
4,500 EUR (E3)
Limited by: 5 working days from a complete intake

5. What is outside scope

This is an engineering opinion supported by a documented model. It is not a design package and confers no design liability. Specifically outside scope:

6. How the answer is produced

7. To proceed

Commission the engagement and you will receive an intake link for the hall's numbers. The clock starts when the intake is complete, not when payment clears.

Before you spend anything with us: get the DSO position in writing on firm capacity and any flexibility product. It costs nothing but time, and on some sites it ends the question entirely. We would rather tell you that now than bill you to discover it.
EVIDENCE DISCLOSURE: the findings in section 1 are a screening read built partly on library defaults. electrical capacity is E0 where an issued deliverable requires E3; cooling performance is E0 where an issued deliverable requires E2; capex is E0 where an issued deliverable requires E1. They are sufficient to decide whether this engagement is worth commissioning, and not sufficient to support procurement, construction or an investment committee decision. Closing the gaps in section 3 is what changes that.

Appendix A — Assumptions, provenance and validation status

Every number in this report carries an evidence class. The class of a computed number is never higher than the weakest of its inputs, so a model applied to measured data yields a modelled number and never a measurement.

ClassMeaning
E0assumed
E1modelled
E2simulated
E3estimated
E4validated against test data
E5supplied by the client (not measured or surveyed by us)
E6field-validated
E7observed in operation

E5 means supplied by the client — a declared rating, contract term or design value, or the client's own data as given. It is not a measurement we made, and it has not been verified by a site survey.

A.1 Assumptions relied upon

A.2 Sources

A.3 Provenance of headline quantities

QuantityEvidenceModelDigest
deployable racks as foundE0input2251cf0df6fb
deployable racks after reliefE0input8869e76332d4
elapsed weeks to full energisationE3input85cf5cf7107b
Density Screen fixed feeE3input7ca2ecfa0a05
GridForge AI — independent power and thermal engineering. We quote no equipment and take no margin on hardware.
Generated 2026-09-14 by the GridForge-AI envelope engine.