Board summary — Reference Colocation Campus, hall DH-02

Reference Project (synthetic) · NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 · summary of the Capacity & Density Envelope Study

Site
Reference Colocation Campus
Hall
DH-02
Target platform
NVIDIA GB300 NVL72
Recommended architecture
Full DLC plus behind-the-meter supply
SYNTHETIC REFERENCE DATA — NOT A CUSTOMER ASSET. All values are modelled or assumed; none is a measurement of a real site.

The answer

Deployable NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 racks today
0 racks (E0)
Limited by: rack feed / tap-off rating
Deployable racks after the costed works
62 racks (E0)
Limited by: Full DLC plus behind-the-meter supply
IT load at that point
8,370 [8,180–8,800] kW (E0)
Limited by: at the recommended architecture
Time to full capacity
160 [80–210] weeks (E0)
Limited by: set by transformer capacity; works run in parallel
Indicative capital cost
18,800,000 [9,420,000–37,700,000] EUR (E0)
Limited by: Class 5 (order of magnitude): -50% / +100% · LOWER BOUND: a cost it needs has no price
As the hall stands it cannot host a single rack of the target platform. Stopping here is a legitimate outcome of this study.

What decides it

Why it mattersConstraintReliefCostLead time
binds firstAchievable facility water temperatureAdiabatic assist plus trim chiller on the high-temperature loop350,000 [175,000–700,000] EUR (E0)32 [20–48] weeks (E0)
largest costFirm supply (grid import + behind-the-meter)Behind-the-meter supply: GEN-5MW (gas_engine, 5 MW)4,000,000 [2,800,000–5,200,000] EUR (E0)44 [28.6–59.4] weeks (E0)
sets the dateTransformer capacityReplace / add transformer capacity (uprate ~60%)1,920,000 [960,000–3,840,000] EUR (E0)160 [80–210] weeks (E0)

Of 20 steps on the full ladder; the study lists all of them.

How firm this is

EVIDENCE DISCLOSURE: screening study on library defaults and assumed inputs: electrical capacity is E0 where an issued deliverable requires E3; cooling performance is E0 where an issued deliverable requires E2; capex is E0 where an issued deliverable requires E1. Sufficient to decide whether to spend money finding out; not sufficient for procurement, construction or an investment committee decision.

What to decide next

Appendix A — Assumptions, provenance and validation status

Every number in this report carries an evidence class. The class of a computed number is never higher than the weakest of its inputs, so a model applied to measured data yields a modelled number and never a measurement.

ClassMeaning
E0assumed
E1modelled
E2simulated
E3estimated
E4validated against test data
E5supplied by the client (not measured or surveyed by us)
E6field-validated
E7observed in operation

E5 means supplied by the client — a declared rating, contract term or design value, or the client's own data as given. It is not a measurement we made, and it has not been verified by a site survey.

A.1 Assumptions relied upon

A.2 Sources

A.3 Provenance of headline quantities

QuantityEvidenceModelDigest
deployable racks as foundE0input2251cf0df6fb
deployable racks after reliefE0input8869e76332d4
deployable IT loadE0envelope.it_loada4e3fd845acb
elapsed weeks to full capacityE0inputddfa75087f01
total capexE0economics.total_capex9eed5fbc0658
adiabatic assist and trim chillerE0inputaf0380aad4fa
lead timeE0input3141b684dcc2
GEN-5MW installed capexE0power.btm_capex1be583b10fb5
GEN-5MW lead timeE0input481a422b0494
transformer and switchgear uprateE0costs.scaled_reliefa9ead11db2b8
power transformer lead timeE0input010015f8a59e
One page for a board. The study it summarises carries the full ladder, scenarios, sensitivity and provenance. Engineering opinion supported by a documented model; not a design package.
Generated 2026-09-14 by the GridForge-AI envelope engine.